The Holocaust of Sex Offenders

A lesson from World War II is to look beyond irrational laws created by the Nazis but focus on the way those laws were quietly reinforced by citizens without challenge or question. Initially, it was the German people and other nations that played a pivotal part of extermination of Jewish populations along with homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, or anyone indifferent to the political ideology of the Nazis or its particular allies. After the war, nations took an oath never to allow people to become labeled, marked, branded, or classified creating any forms of second-class citizenry. The U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington DC reminds us of valuable lesson from a particular period. Silence and indifference to the suffering of others, or to the infringement of civil rights in any society, can—however unintentionally—perpetuate problems. Another lesson is the Holocaust was not an accident in history; it occurred because individuals, organizations, and governments made choices that legalized not only discrimination but also allowed prejudice, hatred, and ultimately mass murder to happen. Ironic that a museum teaching historical lessons about branding, labels, prejudice, and hatred are steps away from Congress where such laws of injustice are frequently created.

Naturally, there are vast differences between the Holocaust and the sex offender registry. However many parallels reflect how registered, the accused, convicted, or those suspected as potential offenders are labeled. One could argue that Jewish people committed no crime in comparison to a registered offender. However, many accused are convicted by plea deals or mear suspicion. It is only later with the introduction of discovery evidence, recants, perjury, or hidden evidence that sometimes pardons the innocent.  As for those that are indeed guilty they are the faces that somehow become the broad label of anyone closely related to offenders – somewhat similar to how jews or homosexuals were and are somewhat labeled today.   While we live in a nation based on fast and speedy trial notions, there is not much emphasis on thorough and impartial investigation overall. Sex offenders have been ignored, ostracized, and shunned far into ghettos or low living standards, banned from social media, rejected employment, unable to qualify for food assistance, unable to afford or secure medical attention and other humane issues that promote fairness and assimilation within the fabric of American society. In fact, registered or convicted offenders no longer on the registry are slowly dying on the cusp of a constructed genocide machine based on a culture of segregation and demarkation. The registry is slowly changing from a second-class citizenship towards statelessness or perhaps a new and improved version of Jim Crow laws. Just as nations during WWII slowed or stopped the influx of Jewish settlers escaping unfair and harsh conditions by the Nazis, it’s U.S. states that accentuate the same conditions by disallowing those convicted of sexual offenses from departing or living freely within its borders unless police give permission. If this isn’t a method of efficacious genocide and Gestapo tactics, then I don’t know what else to say to convince you otherwise?

We are a nation of laws and consequences. At no point should a criminal charge become a “deal-making moment” for prosecutors or public policy convenience. Instead, the gavel of justice should be equally fair in punishment as the crime fits – if the person is indeed guilty. Today we see individuals convicted of murder or other felonious offenses released to live, work, and benefit freely from the bureaucracy of additional requirements. However, a first-time sex offender must endure for life the branded label of real-life purgatory until they die, commit suicide, or pass on. It is the new concentration camp that sex offenders must endure.  A large number of the registered are homeless, seek food pantries or meals, and attempt to live off the streets if permitted based on the jurisdictional law because they way politicians designed the registry requirements. It is no different than historical Nazi agendas, and we are slowly repeating a genocide and nationalist rhetoric all over again forgetting history and how it affected a particular group of people.

To the average registered offender, a life of prison would far be better and more accessible to maneuver than the complicated registry and its ever-changing requirements. I do not know of any person that has ever been released from jail to have parole/registry/civil commitment requirements for thirty years to a lifetime? I know of no other criminal offense where a person must register with police on where he/she may live; or get permission to live at an address? I know of no such laws where individuals are disqualified from obtaining a real estate, commercial driver license, or medical certification; or having to turn documentation in to have “Sex Offender” stamped all over it to alert others? Offender endure policies such as anyone convicted of a sexual assault are banned from military installations, but convicted felons can access as long as the conviction is over seven years? I know of no other agency that requires sentenced individuals to relinquish internet identifiers? The list goes on and continues to grow no different than how the Nazis created bureaucratic laws confusing the Jewish population that constructively sent them to concentration camps and eventually their deaths. This is a recipe towards constructive genocide by any nation that defines and separates misdemeanors, felons, from registered offenders as another identifier. It is an ugly and straightforward issue that must be addressed as an equivalent and comparison to how the Nazi’s implemented its Final Solution formula.

The comparisons may sound a bit harsh, over the top, or exaggerated to some. However, if Americans want to stop becoming mass murderers and facilitating a machine of orchestrated ghettos, tent cities, homeless shelters, and poverty-stricken individuals, then it must end the sex offender registry and its divisional standard on classifications of a particular class of people it chose to identify. The registry is not informational or educative. It is an additional punishment tool no different than wearing a Star of David brassard or an inked concentration tattoo number. The registry is a weaponized database that places private information in a public setting to facilitate and teach others how to achieve or become vigilantes, stalkers, preconception based zealots, and a fear factory of rhetoric comparable to how ordinary Germans labeled Jewish or those suspected to be related, homosexual, or didn’t support its government ideology for punishment. It is an international danger towards humanity filled with bugaboo and trepidation. Yet, we continue to add policy to the Registry Final Solution creating unbearable conditions or opportunities for redemption.

Have we learned any lessons from the Holocaust or the acts of history perhaps repeating itself? I am not so optimistic about the learning outcome. However, one thing may be a valuable lesson learned is that citizens that implement and support methods to rid of people instead of a problem will ultimately be held accountable for his/her actions later in life. Merely interjecting later down the road that “we had no idea what was going on?” is not going to be enough to warrant an excuse. Accountability begins today so that we restore dignity by ending discrimination, prejudice, hatred, and ultimately a convenient state-sponsored murder scheme created in part by the sex offender registry. The Holocaust took the lives of over six million people. The sex offender registry is slowly inching its way towards that number.

Author: Dwayne Daughtry

“You’re punching, and you’re kicking, ​and you’re shouting at me / I’m relying on your common decency?" I tried to become vegan (it was the worst 6 hours of my life), Executive Director - NCRSOL, State Representative (NC) - NARSOL, Legislative Consultant, Blogging Columnist, Army veteran, Arizona State alum | B.A. Organizational Leadership | M.S. Political Science | Ph.D. student Criminal Justice

6 thoughts on “The Holocaust of Sex Offenders”

  1. It’s about time people opened their eyes. The fact is I don’t know if the general population would care given that we are living in a declining and angry,godless society as were the Germans at that point in history. Never give into evil. Very factual and well written article

  2. Yes, there are differences.. and I have compared the similarities for years. What shocks me is that the majority of Jews in America I have brought this topic up with disagree and are for the unconstitutional sex offender registry.. and I find it very upsetting. My only answer to that is they where groomed by our Government to believe this registry protects the children..Just as the German citizens were groomed, influenced, Brainwashed by the Nazi’s to believe the Jews were parasite’s.

  3. SOR, a form of Social Genocide???

    SOR same steps as Hitler did, GENOCIDE of Jews, Sex Offenders political dissidents etc. 1930’s – 1940’s.
    First step Government and RCMP registry of sex offenders, made into law like Hitlers.
    Second placed under military control like Hitler did.
    Third, well we know what happened, are we next?

    Like Joseph Globles did for Hitler’s Genocide of the Jews, political minorities, Sex offenders, etc..
    Familiar Foot Steps? Perhaps.

    (( The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is “PERCIVED” AS Working for the Benefit of the Children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation. ))

    Synonym for genocide, employed to describe patterns of cultural genocide. Destruction of a group’s cultural, linguistic, and existential underpinnings without necessarily killing members of the group.

    Term coined by Michael Mann to describe the killing of factional enemies with in political (notably communist) movements

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    ( Jail killings, Vigilantly Justice Creep Catchers )

    (b) Causing serious bodily harm, or harm to mental health, to members of the group;
    ( Social and Financial Stress propagating mental and physical health issues. )

    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    ( Hard to acquire Gainful Employment, Housing and Relationships for life. )

    With this perception in place who will hire these offenders giving them a meaningful income or have long term, Relationship, let alone rental housing etc.. These offenders are virtually left to reoffend in other types of criminal activities, rarely 97.3% do not reoffend in sexual offences, majority of sexual offences being non violent. All weighted against them for life.
    SOR, a form of Social Genocide of a specific collective of offenders. With no hope of Judicial freedom or Liberty, for life and Placed under Marshall Law.

    Sex Offenders, Have the lowest Recvidism of all but murders
    Public Safety Canada, RCMP, Mc Lean’s, etc. FACT!
    1. 84%+ are first time offenders.
    2. 97.3% do not reoffend, in the same offence.
    3. 95%+ offender and injured person, know each other.
    4. S O R has not prevented or solved 1 sex offence, since its inception in 2004. $$$$$ RCMP Data!1/08/2008 From < http:/ /
    5. 25 out of 46768 were by strangers. Stranger Danger Largely Mythical Threat. ( CBC Canada May 8, 2013 ) A False projection and perceptions of protecting children. For votes!
    6. Canadian Offender programs, unknown if they work or not. No studies done with controlled group. Can increase reoffending by 3%. Corrections Oregon.

    7. Countries USA, Australia, New Zealand, England, almost mirror this data above.

    (As George Orwell put it: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”)

    Constitutional Constraints? "True" Justice?
    All too often, public officials decry constitutional constraints on their ability to dispense "true" justice. The questionable constitutionality of offender registry is placed last in this series of issues surrounding offender registry in general because, until they affect us personally, civil rights are usually the last thing on our minds. What we must never forget, is that the Constitution exists to protect all Canadian citizens from Nefarious Encroachments of injustice at the hands of the government.

    This collectives Constitutional Rights have been strip from them. Are yours next? Just where is our Constitutional Protection from the Nefarious Encroachments of Our Government and Judicial System's against this Collective, and Society.

    New Laws on Drunk driving, are open ended going beyond your car to your home etc. Breath testing. Your Constitutional rights being shackled.

    More citizens have died from Fentanyl etc., than all DUI`s across Canada Yearly.. Fact!

    Stephen Harper / Peter Gordon MacKay`s Conservative Platform, similar to Hitlers for political gain. Instilling and Propagating, Fear and Hate into Society, to remove Constitutional Rights. Shaping Public Opinion" "The Fear Factor./" (Stephen Harper / Peter Gordon MacKay`s "Tough on Crime: ( Facts and Stephen Harper, LIES of OMISSION )

    The Judicial Hypocrisy, RCMP and Canada Boarder Services Sexual assaults etc. against their members / employees 3,200 to 40,000 Victims may come forward.
    SURETY`s $ ? Hush Money, stopping the Judicial process, no Investigations or Judicial Prosecutions.

    Higgerty Law and David Klein LLP

    July 7,2019 above settlement from 1974 to present now in place to side step RCMP prosecutions, an Obstruction and Perversion of justice. With No Criminal record or SOR Etc. Placed on them.
    Directly Condoning their actions. $$$$$$

    A salary and, a SURETY pay out for their services. Prostitutes

    Perverting the course of justice
    Canada In the equivalent offence is referred to as “obstructing justice”. It is set out s 139 of the Criminal Code:

    139. (1) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in a judicial proceeding, (a) by indemnifying or agreeing to indemnify a SURETY, in any way and either in whole or in part, or (b) where there is a surety, by accepting or agreeing to accept a fee or any form of indemnity whether in whole or in part from or in respect of a person who is released or is to be released from custody, is guilty of (c) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or (d) an offence punishable on summary conviction. (2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years. (3) Without restricting the generality of subsection (2), every one shall be deemed wilfully to attempt to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice who in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, (a) dissuades or attempts to dissuade a person by threats, bribes or other corrupt means from giving evidence; (b) influences or attempts to influence by threats, bribes or other corrupt means a person in his conduct as a juror; or (c) accepts or obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain a bribe or other corrupt consideration to abstain from giving evidence, or to do or to refrain from doing anything as a juror.
    From <https: //

    I take full responsibility for this article.
    Frank De Smet

  4. A Question to be answered”?”

    Are you as innocent as you purport and portray to be?
    This is “Not to be taken out of Context”. There is no Malic Intended “Only the Truth” to be Gleaned.
    ” Under The Me Too Umbrella ” Sexual Offences

    Sexual Assault?
    Were you Assaulted, Bullied, Coerced , Harassed, Bribed, Pressured for sex etc.. Were Under the, influence of Alcohol or Drugs, had Inappropriate Touching, kissing etc.. Had Non Ongoing Verbal Consent through out the physical sexual inter action, or had Explicit unwanted sexual language these are all sexual assaults. Assumed Consent is also, Consent not given, or non consensual Pictorial sexual data taken or distributed, etc.. or placed into an intimate uncomfortable situations.
    Report it..

    Lawyers Frank Caputo, David Klein, Patrick Higgerty, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale,. Judges Mayland Mc Kimm, Roy Dickey. Crown Colin Forsyth, , Brock Martland. Lawyer Jeremy Jensen, Probation Clyde Ferro, Arron Kidd. RCMP Charles Grim, RCMP Dale Baker. and Reporter Tim Petruk, Or any other person in a Position of Legal Authority.

    A Very High probability each one of them have Assaulted or Sexually Assaulted Someone by “There Silence”. Just How many Skeletons will come out of their past ?????

    I’m Not Stating there are any offences perpetrated, by these individuals above, in any of the above situations. “There is also “No Malic Intended” to those mentioned above, ONLY THE Truth TO BE GLEANED .” How ever, the “Skeletons” of their past will tell the Truth and it is time for the truth to come forward.

    Laws for them and laws for the general public as shown “HYPOCRITES”
    Surety money paid out for RCMP members and employees, who were sexually and physically abused by their own RCMP members, first $100,000. and now a projection of 1.1 billion to be paid to these ( “victims” etc. ? ) No “cap” on the payouts Hypocrites) ” Your tax Dollars”. ( Where are their Prosecutions, DNA, Life long Registries, with jail time, and placed under Marshal law for life????? )

    UP Date: 2019 July,8th New Surety Money Settlement through David Klein Lawyers Vancouver, BC, and Lawyer Patrick Higgerty Calgary Alberta.
    Global TV News.

    Constitutional Constraints? “True” Justice?
    All too often, public officials decry constitutional constraints on their ability to dispense “true” justice. The questionable constitutionality of offender registry is placed last in this series of issues surrounding offender registry in general because, until they affect us personally, civil rights are usually the last thing on our minds. What we must never forget, however, is that the Constitution exists to protect all Canadian citizens from injustice at the hands of the government.

    This collectives Constitutional Rights have been strip from them. Are your yours next? Just where is our Constitutional Protection from the Nefarious Encroachments of Our Government and Judicial System’s against YOU and ME.

    As George Orwell put it: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”

    I take full responsibility for this article.

    Frank De Smet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: